Limitasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Mengadili Kejahatan Supranatural Problem Irreducible Magic Power

Authors

  • Nadiya Yamilla Yesenia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Palangka Raya Author
  • Tio Evangelish Manullang Author

Keywords:

Formal Offense, Incarceration, Irreducible Magic Power , Penological Limitations, Supernatural Crime

Abstract

Article 252 of Law Number 1 of 2023 criminalizes supernatural practices through a formal offense construction focusing on self-declaration of possessing magical powers. This article identifies a fundamental overlooked problem: the phenomenon of irreducible magic power intrinsic magical powers that cannot be stripped away through conventional punishment such as incarceration. This research aims to critically analyze the limitations of the criminal justice system in adjudicating supernatural crimes and introduce a new conceptual framework for evaluating the effectiveness of Article 252. The research urgency lies in the need to evaluate criminal policies regulating phenomena beyond the empirical reach of the justice system, considering potential law enforcement failures and post-punishment social paradoxes. The method employed is normative-juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches, utilizing primary and secondary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. Main findings reveal three layers of fundamental limitations: epistemological limitations in proving the existence of magical powers, penological limitations because incarceration cannot halt the continuity of magical power, and sociological limitations manifested as post-punishment paradoxes that potentially strengthen public belief in the perpetrator's power. This research recommends shifting policy focus from metaphysical proof to measurable social impacts, and strengthening the role of customary law and restorative mechanisms in handling conflicts based on supernatural accusations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New

York: Vintage Books, 1995.

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Edited by Leslie Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press,

2012.

Hiariej, Eddy O. S. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Kelsall, 2009. “Insufficiently Hybrid: Assessing the Special Court for Sierra Leone.” Law & Society

Review 43 (1): 1–41.

Prasetyo, Teguh, and Abdul Halim Barkatullah. Politik Hukum Pidana: Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi

dan Dekriminalisasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

Arthani, Ni Luh Gede Yogi. “Praktek Paranormal dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Jurnal

Advokasi 5, no. 1 (2015): 30–40. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/29391-ID-praktek-

paranormal-dalam-kajian-hukum-pidana-di-indonesia.pdf.

Christinawati, Ayu Denis. “Living Law dalam KUHP Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Adat dan

Dampaknya terhadap Penegakan Hukum.” Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan

Kewarganegaraan 3, no. 1 (2024): 84–94. http://jurnal.anfa.co.i

Faisal. “Pemaknaan Kebijakan Kriminal Perbuatan Santet dalam RUU KUHP.” Jurnal Pendidikan

Hukum Indonesia 11, no. 1 (2023): 1–

12. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jphi/article/view/16269.

Satriadi. “Delik Santet dalam Konstruksi Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Al-

Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam 5, no. 2 (Juli 2020): 135–149. https://jurnal.iain-

bone.ac.id/index.php/aladalah/article/view/807/pdf.

Setyawan, Vincentius Patria, and Gregorius Widiartana. “Criminalization of Santet in the Reform of the

Criminal Law.” Res Judicata 6, no. 1 (2023): 43–50.

http://openjurnal.unmuhpnk.ac.id/index.php/RJ/index.

Inara, Virza. “Analisis Yuridis Pasal 252 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang

Penawaran untuk Melakukan Tindak Pidana Melalui Kekuatan Ghaib.” Skripsi, Universitas

Jambi, 2026. https://repository.unja.ac.id/89456/.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP lama).

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana telah

diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP baru).

Affan, H. "Pembantaian 'dukun santet' 1998-1999 di Banyuwangi: 'Ada tanda silang, lampu tiba-tiba

mati, dan bapak saya dibunuh'." BBC News Indonesia, March 2023.

https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-64806978.

Hardhika, R. "Dilema pembuktian delik santet: Bagaimana hukum pidana membuktikan yang tak

kasat mata?" Pengadilan Negeri Parepare, 2025. http://www.pn-parepare.go.id/berita/artikel-

hukum/dilema-pembuktian-delik-santet-bagaimana-hukum-pidana-membuktikan-yang-tak-

kasat-mata.

Hukumonline. "Mengulas pembuktian delik santet di KUHP baru." Hukumonline, December 2025.

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengulas-pembuktian-delik-santet-di-kuhp-baru-

lt6937a9cf9936d/.

Human Rights Watch. Bringing Justice: The Special Court for Sierra Leone. New York: Human

Rights Watch, 2004. https://www.hrw.org/report/2004/09/08/bringing-justice-special-court-

sierra-leone/accomplishments-shortcomings-and.

Miller, G. "The Devil Made Me Do It: The Viability of Demonic Possession as a Murder Defense."

Vermont Law Review, March 2024. https://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/the-devil-made-me-do-it-

the-viability-of-demonic-possession-as-a-murder-defense/.

Setyo, E.E. "Menelisik pembuktian pidana dalam Pasal 252 KUHP 2023 tentang kekuatan gaib."

Dandapala Digital, October 2025. https://dandapala.com/opini/detail/menelisik-pembuktian-

pidana-dalam-pasal-252-kuhp-2023-tentang-kekuatan-gaib.

Published

14-03-2026

How to Cite

Nadiya Yamilla Yesenia, & Tio Evangelish Manullang. (2026). Limitasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Mengadili Kejahatan Supranatural Problem Irreducible Magic Power. Recht: Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1). https://ejournal.lpkhtrisakti.org/index.php/recht/article/view/25

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.