Artificial Intelligence Voice Cloning and Civil Liability Under Indonesian Copyright Law
Abstract
This article examines the legal protection of performers’ rights against artificial intelligence voice cloning under Indonesian law. The rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies capable of replicating human voices has created significant legal challenges, particularly regarding the unauthorized imitation and commercial exploitation of performers’ vocal identity. While Indonesian Copyright Law recognizes performers’ related rights, it does not expressly regulate synthetic voice replication. This research aims to analyze: (1) how Indonesian Copyright Law regulates the protection of performers’ rights in relation to artificial intelligence voice cloning; (2) whether such practices fulfill the elements of an unlawful act under Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code; and (3) how civil liability should be constructed within the Indonesian legal framework.
This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, supported by secondary legal materials and relevant comparative scholarship. The findings demonstrate that existing copyright provisions provide limited protection, particularly when voice cloning does not involve direct reproduction of a fixed performance. However, artificial intelligence voice cloning may satisfy the elements of an unlawful act where unlawfulness, fault, damage, and causation are established. Civil liability should therefore be constructed through an integrated approach combining related rights protection and general tort principles. The article recommends legislative clarification to explicitly regulate artificial intelligence-generated voice replication in order to ensure legal certainty and balanced protection between technological innovation and performers’ rights.
Downloads
References
References
Book:
Agustina, Rosa. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. KUH Perdata Buku III: Hukum Perikatan dengan Penjelasan. Bandung: Alumni, 1996.
Hage, Jaap. Foundations and Methods of Law. Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57252-9.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia, 2006.
Hutchinson, Terry. “Doctrinal Research: Researching the Jury.” In Research Methods in Law, edited by Dawn Watkins and Mandy Burton, 9–15. London: Routledge, 2013.
Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Rev. ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Samuel, Geoffrey. An Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and Method. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2020.
Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005.
Journal Articles:
Abbott, Ryan. “Everything Is Obvious.” UCLA Law Review 66 (2019): 2–45. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3024422.
Gordon, W. J. “Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law.” Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 45, no. 1 (2021): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v45i1.XXXX.
Guadamuz, Andres. “Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of Originality in Artificial Intelligence Generated Works.” Intellectual Property Quarterly 2 (2017): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2981304.
McCutcheon, Jani. “Artificial Intelligence and the Creative Industry: New Challenges for Copyright Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 13, no. 7 (2018): 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy031.
Rothman, Jennifer E. “The Right of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined for a Public World.” Yale Law Journal 123, no. 2 (2013): 214–278. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129155.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Recht: Journal of Legal Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




